By Barry R. Goukler
"It takes a good template to get a good printing result, then it helps Automation is repeatable."
Stencil acquisition is not only the first step in assembly is one of the most important. The primary function of the template is to facilitate solder paste deposition. The object is an exact amount of material to transfer the exact location on the bare printed circuit board (PCBs). The less paste into the template deposited depended more on the board. So if something goes wrong in the printing process, the first reaction to the template's fault. However, it is well to remember that there are important variables other than those the template, which could affect their performance. These variables include the printer, particle size and viscosity of solder paste, the style, material, durometer, speed and pressure of the squeegee, the breakaway of the stencil from the PCB (gasketing effect); thickness and flatness of the solder mask and component planarity.
The TechnologiesThe three most important technologies for the manufacture of stencils are chemical etching, laser cutting and electroplating. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Chemical etching and laser cutting are subtractive processes, electroplating is an additive process. Accordingly, certain parameter comparisons, such as pricing, fall into comparing apples and oranges. Instead, the focus is on performance and costs and lead times coupled.
Generally, chemically etched (chem-etched) stencils are just as effective as those of the other technologies when used for applications where the tightest pitch is 0.025" and over. Instead, laser-cut and electroformed stencils should be considered when dealing with 0.020" pitch and under. While the latter type stencils will work well for 0.025" pitch and over, it may be difficult to justify the cost and turnaround time.
| Figure 1. Etchant action is both vertical and horizontal in the creation of a knife edge, or hourglass, configuration. |
Chem-etch stencils are the workhorses of the stencil world. They are the most cost effective and the quickest to turn around. (Same day shipments are a daily occurrence.) Chem-etched stainless-steel stencils are created by coating a metal foil with resist, exposing an image onto both sides with a pin-registered phototool and then etching the foil from both sides simultaneously using a dual-sided process. Since the process is dual-sided, the apertures, or openings, are created as the etchant works through the metal not only from the top and bottom, but also horizontally. Inherent in this technique is the creation of a knife edge, or hourglass, configuration (Figure 1). While at 0.020" pitch and under, such a profile presents an opportunity for paste impedance, this drawback can be minimized with an enhancement process called electropolishing.
| Figure 2. The "smoothing" effect of electropolishing on the stencil's aperture walls significantly reduces surface friction and promotes good paste release. |
Another technique to improve paste release for 0.020" pitch and under is trapezoidal section apertures (TSA).
| Figure 3. Trapezoidal section apertures, while promoting effective paste release, also form a "brick-like" deposit that assists firm component placement. |
| Figure 4. The stepdown feature (for variously pitched components) is recommended for at least 0.100" clearance between parts to permit complete paste distribution on both levels of the stencil. |
| Figure 5. The electroforming process. The nickel atoms are deflected by the photoresist to create trapezoidal-shaped apertures. |
Chem-etch Limitations. In addition to the drawbacks of the knife-edge configuration, chem-etched stencils have another limitation: the aspect ratio. In simplest terms, the ratio limits the smallest aperture opening that can be etched in terms of the metal thickness at hand. Typically, for chem-etch stencils the aspect ratio is defined as 1.5 to 1. Thus, with a 0.006" thick stencil, the minimum aperture opening will be 0.009" (0.006" x 1.5 = 0.009"). By contrast, for electroformed and laser-cut stencils the aspect ratio is 1 to 1, i.e., one can create a 0.006" opening in a 0.006" thick stencil via either process.
Electroforming
An additive rather than a subtractive process, electroforming creates a nickel stencil with a unique gasketing feature that reduces solder bridging and minimizes the need for underside stencil cleaning. This process provides near-perfect registration with no geometric limitations, smooth vertical sidewalls with a built-in taper and low surface tension to enhance paste release.
The stencil is created by imaging photoresist on a substrate (or mandrel) where the apertures are intended and then plating — atom by atom, layer by layer — the stencil around the resist to the desired thickness. As seen in Figure 5, the nickel atoms are deflected by the photoresist to create a trapezoidal configuration. Next, when the stencil is removed from the substrate, the top becomes the contact side to create the gasketing effect. A continuous nickel thickness range of 0.001 to 0.012" may be selected. This process is ideally suited for ultra-fine-pitch requirements (0.008 to 0.016") or for other applications. An aspect ratio of 1 to 1 can be achieved.
As for drawbacks, since a phototool is involved (albeit one-sided) the potential for misregistration exists. And if the plating process is not uniform, the gasketing effect is negated. Also, the gasketing "nubs" can be removed if the cleaning process is too vigorous.
Laser-cut Stencils
Produced directly from the customer's original Gerber data, laser-cut stainless-steel stencils feature an absence of photographic steps. Hence, eliminating the opportunity for misregistration. A stencil can be made with excellent positional accuracy and reproducibility. The Gerber file, after the necessary modifications, is transferred to (and directly drives) the laser. Less physical intervention means fewer opportunities for error. Although there were initial concerns about the dross (vaporized molten metal) created by the laser beam, the current generation of laser cutters produces minimal dross that is removed easily.
| Figure 6. Pad geometries. With the transfer of Gerber data, pad configurations can be altered into various shapes as a means of reducing solder paste volume. |
The laser technique is the only process that permits an existing stencil to be reworked, e.g., to add apertures, enlarge existing apertures or add fiducials.
Other Advances
Other than laser cutting and electroforming, the most significant advance in stencil manufacturing has been electronic data transfer. As recently as 1995, the majority of artwork supplied to stencil manufacturers was in the form of film positives, which were expected to match the image on the bare copper 1 to 1. Component aperture modifications involved repetitive camera work and manual manipulations. The process also relied on the quality of the supplied film positive. Finally, the creation of step-and-repeat artwork was a tedious task.
| Figure 7. Adhesive conversion. With this capability, the solder paste layer in the design file can be converted to rounds and oblongs, depending on component size. |
With the transfer of Gerber files, pad geometries can be altered from squares and rectangles to "home plates," "grids," "zippers," etc. (Figure 6) as a means of reducing solder paste volume. Adjusting solder paste volumes by modifying geometries, combined with selecting the right metal thickness, also can eliminate the need for stepdowns. A single-level stencil, properly designed, is always better than a dual-level tool from a process standpoint.
Adhesive Stencils
Electronic files also enable the computer-aided design (CAD) operator to easily determine the centroid of a pad configuration. With this capability, the solder paste layer in the design file can be converted to rounds and oblongs, depending on component size (Figure 7). Thus a stencil can be made, enabling one to "print," rather than dispense, adhesive. Printing is faster than dispensing, which frees up this equipment to work on other jobs.
Rework Stencils
A more recent innovation occurs in the rework area. There are now "mini-micro" stencils available that are miniature stencils designed specifically to rework or repair individual components. Stencils may be purchased for single components such as standard QFPs and ball grid arrays (BGA). The mini-micro also comes with its own corresponding spatula, or mini-squeegee.
Pricing Comparisons
- Chem-etched stencil pricing is driven by the frame size. While the metal foil is the focus of the stencil creation process, the frame is the single, most expensive fixed cost. Its size is determined to a large extent by the type of printer. Most printers, however, will accommodate more than one frame size. (Frame sizes are industry standard.) Most stencil suppliers maintain an inventory of standard frame sizes ranging from 5 x 5" to 29 x 29". Since the blank metal foil cost is not as significant as that of the frame, metal thickness has no effect on pricing. And because all the apertures are etched simultaneously, their number also is of no consequence.
- Electroformed stencil pricing is driven primarily by the metal thickness (with an "adder" for whatever frame size is required). Plating up to the desired thickness is the dominant consideration: the thicker stencil costing more than the thinner.
- Laser-cut stencil pricing is according to the aperture number in the design.
Summary
Whatever current surface mount assembly needs may be, there presently is a stencil technology that meets that need. Some discussed innovations, such as trapezoidal section apertures, hybrid stencils and the pre-eminence of electronic data transfer, have all been developed and refined in the past three or four years. The stencil industry traditionally has been not only quick to respond to new requirements but also proactive in these ongoing developments.
This article is adapted from a presentation originally given at NEPCON West 2000.
REFERENCES
- C. L. Hutchins, "Fine-pitch Stencil Technology," SMT, July 1996.
- W. E. Coleman, "Stencil Design and Application for SMD, Through-hole, BGA and Flip Chips," Advancing Microelectronics, January/February 1996.
- R. Clouthier, "Appraising Stencils for Fine-pitch Printing," SMT, March 1995.
- W. E. Coleman, "Stencil Design for Advanced Packages," SMT, June 1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment